I posted earlier
that AIDS Denialist and LA Private Investigator Clark Baker is focusing his
attention on the US Military justice system. Baker’s storefront business, the
Office of Medical and Scientific Justice (OMSJ) is paid by US taxpayers to bring AIDS
denialists to the court.
How are AIDS
Denialists used as experts in legal cases?
According to the
defense attorneys involved in these cases, denialist testimony concentrates
on HIV testing, diagnosis and treatment. Court petitions show that their
expertise is needed to explain sample processing, the use of testing equipment,
interpretation of test results, and dozens of other factors that are necessary
to establish whether someone is or is not infected with HIV.
AIDS Denialists
testify under oath that people living with HIV infection who are accused of
having unprotected sex without disclosing their HIV status cannot possibly be
guilty of endangering anyone because HIV does not cause AIDS. And even if HIV
does cause AIDS, HIV tests are invalid and cannot be used to diagnose HIV
infection.
The defense
attorneys themselves are not buying into the OMSJ story. But as one of them
told me, if it can get their guy off they will use it.
OMSJ is not about the
truth. Clark Baker is paid to deliver doubt.
Defense attorneys
contract Baker because they have been convinced that AIDS deniers can raise
doubt, even if based on lies, pseudoscience, and conspiracy theories. Anyone
who has listened to AIDS Denialists knows all too well that they can raise
doubt.
And it gets worse when prosecutors call true experts, allowing the AIDS
Denialists to create the illusion of a scientific debate.
Is AIDS denialism
a competent defense?
There is not a
single case where AIDS Denialists actually accounted for an acquittal or dismissal.
Despite their trying, AIDS denialists in courts have failed in the US, Canada,
Europe, and Australia.
The military
case that Clark Baker boasts winning was actually thrown out of court. People
close to the case have told me that the judge’s ruling had nothing to do with
OMSJ testimony delivered by Nancy Turner Banks and Rodney Richards. In fact there
were technical factors regarding the alleged assault that resulted in the
dismissal.
In another military case, the accused was found guilty after OMSJ experts testified.
Not surprisingly, Baker does not have much to say about this case.
US Taxpayers are
funding OMSJ in Military Courts
In the Military
Justice System, the US government is responsible for both prosecuting the
accused and providing a sound defense. That means the prosecution has to
ensure that the case is properly tried. Because the
Military is responsible for both prosecuting and defending the accused, they
are required to clear defense experts and approve their cost to taxpayers.
That is why the Army
has required the defense to use Army experts in cases involving OMSJ. (see post
below for Baker’s whining about it) And by the way, those Army experts are
actually true experts who are very helpful in making the AIDS Deniers of OMSJ
look like idiots. The true experts will not lie under oath. Of course, when
experts on the same side do not agree it can cause even more confusion and
potentially more doubt.
As a matter of
military due process, service members are entitled to expert assistance and the
military defense has the resources of the government at its disposal to pay for
this assistance. The basis for the requests comes from cases such as US v.
Garries. It is understandable that the defense has a right to
government-funded expert assistance. And at the same time the government has
the responsibility not to waste its funds on cranks, quacks and frauds. Hence,
the OMSJ experts are most often not accepted as experts and not allowed to
testify.
Baker and OMSJ
act as the agents in this theatre of the absurd. The $3500 that is charged for
pre-trial consultation goes to Baker. If the AIDS denialist expert testifies,
Baker gets another $400+ per hour + travel + fees.
In my previous
blog post on OMSJ (see below), I discussed David Rasnick and Rodney Richards. I
only mentioned Nancy Turner Banks briefly without much detail. She seems to be on the
witness / consultants list for all of these OMSJ Military cases. My previous
post raised questions about her perceptions of reality. Here is a more complete
accounting.
Nancy Turner
Banks received an MD from Harvard in 1978 and a Masters of Business
Administration in the area of Finance in 1996. Her most recent professional
appointment was as a consultant physician in private practice of Obstetrics and
Gynecology in Nyack, New York. She has never held an academic appointment and
she has only published one work -- Her self-published book entitled AIDS, Opium, Diamonds and Empire, the
Deadly Virus of International Greed, published by Universal in 2010. According to Dr. Banks, she “tells the
dramatic story of a financial ideology that is damaging to everything that it
means to be human. It is the story of a long running global conspiracy and
business model that can be traced back to the British East India Company that
places profits over people. In the end, it is the story of hope and how we can
regain our sanity and our health in a world gone mad.”
In reality, her
ideas are firmly rooted on AIDS denialism. This is not surprising given that
she is a long-term member of the Rethinking AIDS Society. Nancy Turner Banks
believes that AIDS is a conspiracy between secret
government agencies, the CDC, and pharmaceutical companies. But what is unique about
Nancy Turner Banks is that she includes the DeBeers Mining Company in her
conspiracy. These forces are believed to conspire to kill blacks and profit
from HIV. To build her case, she cites Andrew Carrington Hitchock’s 2006 book
‘The Synagogue of Satan’ and Eustace Mullins’ ‘The New History of the Jews’.
If you are not
familiar with Andrew Carrington Hitchcock, here is a sample of his views.
“Hitler had been doing phenomenally well in turning his
country around economically by breaking with the Jewish international bankers
and trading by barter
Hitler
simply issued what money was needed on the authority of the German Government,
which was backed by the productivity of the German labour force, and not the
empty promises of Jewish international bankers
The
citizens of Germany were able to make Germany the most powerful and prosperous
state in Europe in only a seven year period
The
Jews could not let this continue as they knew that it would spell the death of
their debt driven money system and so World War 2 starts
This
is not a war between Germany and the Allies, it is a war between Germany and
the Jewish money power”
Nancy Turner
Banks herself is a regular on the anti-Semitic radio program ‘The French
Connection’. Banks therefore is a rare find – a blend of genocidal conspiracy
theories, AIDS denialism and a clear link to Holocaust Denial.
Nancy Turner
Banks is at the center of the OMSJ defense team.
I think that says it all.
Let's see in Eugene Semon will still try to deny Bank's anti-Semitism, which is as obvious as the viruses in the micrograph. [http://nyaa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/hiv-virus-june-09.jpg] So probably.
ReplyDeleteI still find it surprising that a defense attorney would try to use Clark Baker or Nancy Banks to sow doubt. True, you use whatever imperfect tools you can to make your case, particularly since most of these affairs are open-shut matter and lost causes from the get-go. But these people are such obvious nutcases, that even a non-science person will soon shudder in disbelief of their stupidity and hatred on the cross exam. Duesberg might sow some doubt among the uniformed, but employing the kooks at OMSJ is just throwing away money. There is good reason they have never yet helped any case. Hopefully, everyone will soon realize this, and we won't have to listen to their deranged rants.
ReplyDeleteI want to know how NTB graduated Harvard Medical School. Want she always the insane, hate filled, know-nothing she is today? Because now, I wouldn't let her be in the same room with a baby. And I certainly wouldn't trust her to know which end of a woman is up. So how did she pass?
ReplyDeleteDr. Banks has zero credibility. In her self-published book she claimed that gay men would take Bactrim as a prophylactic for STDs before going out to have sex with multiple partners. This is false for one big reason: Bactrim is not used as a prophylactic nor as a treatment for STDs. If she were a decent doctor she would know that. The statement that gay men are all whores also shows what bigot she is, hence the name:
ReplyDeleteDr. Bigot-Banks.
Also in her self-published book, she came right out and said that everyone in the scientific field, including doctors, nurses, researchers etc were all involved in a huge and complete conspiracy going back at least 50 years and probably even 100 years.
She is right where she belongs in the company of Baker et al. She should feel right at home.
Hi Seth,
ReplyDeleteI've only recently fallen down the rabbit hole and discovered the fascinating world of aids denial. I've gotten a lot out of this blog, and ordered your book :)
Have you read the book, "Why People Believe Weird Things", by Michael Shermer? There is a chapter in it, which examines holocaust denial. It's striking just how identical the methodologies of these groups are; ignoring a vast body of mutually supportive data, and instead grasping at apparent - and disparate - anomalies.
Also, the work of Celia Farber, Brent Leung et al, has a David Irving-esque quality - they aggressively promote rarefied positions, yet insist they are disinterested journalists/historians.
Anyway, from the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock quotes in your post, it seems like we're dealing with something a little more than a bog-standard holocaust denier. They read as uninhibited, genocidal, Nazism.
Turner Banks sounds unhinged.
The violent Nazi "anti-Zionist" movement has two other things in common with AIDS denial, besides Nancy Turner Banks. 1) They plagiarize off each other like crazy. 2) They are perpetually engaged in feuds over which of them is "too whacko".
DeleteI am so glad you posted a dedicated piece on the OM$J scam. Baker figures if he can get paid by military defense attorneys, he'll have a good cash scam going. I am glad this piece is now on the internet so it serves as further evidence for any reasonable person to use if they ever look up the bloated fool of Clarkie Parking Cop Baker.
ReplyDelete"My previous post raised questions about her perceptions of reality."
ReplyDeleteYour questions are answered here:
Where other conferences end... Conspiracy Con Begins!
Snout
ReplyDeleteWhere have you been? I thought you got squashed by a garbage truck!
Nick "SNOUT" Bennett, need I say more?
Sure as hell makes of a lot more sense than your claim to be some lonesome sheepherder who preaches in church on Sundays being this damn interested in AIDS anything, tell you what!
Your buddy BAKER let the cat out of the bag, you hack.
I just love the that way you swithched around the topic list on that lame duck website of yours after you were completely beat-down too. lol
Keep on with the subject that you are preaching now and see where it gets you, dog-breath.
Man, even when you guys smack-talk, you can't avoid sounding like imbeciles.
DeletenotElon
ReplyDeleteWhatever you say.
I have also seen what you said about what that person put on the dogs website. You are perhaps the cross-eyed king of all the imbeciles here, zoonosis-boy.
Okay...
DeleteIntelligent defense, perfectly legitimate and it delivers resulsts.
ReplyDeleteDelivering doubt is a piece of cake when you're dealing with the pseudoscience of HIV testinf, which is the art of covering as many cross-reacting antibodies as you practically can to have as many conditions as possible can relabeled as "infection with HIV", so you can justify treating them with expensive, chronifying ARVs isntead of their generic known remedies.