tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post1565061902865985620..comments2024-02-25T14:29:44.021-05:00Comments on Denying AIDS and other oddities: The Legal System Turned Upside Down: Defining, Diagnosing, and Denying HIVSeth Kalichmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01715826946361587097noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-19263316554144423072013-06-11T08:24:36.694-04:002013-06-11T08:24:36.694-04:00I now agree.
At first I thought Hendricks must hav...I now agree.<br />At first I thought Hendricks must have been unaware of who he was dealing with. But his report going directly to Rasnick says it all.<br />What scientist would affiliate with Rasnick?? <br />All it takes is a simple Google search to see who Rasnick is and how he would be using those reports.<br />I bet the UMass Administration does that search. <br />Next thing you know Rasnick will be flashing a UMass ID saying he is faculty ... We have seen him pull that stunt as well. <br />At the very least this is misuse of the UMass lab.<br /><br />It is also only a matter of time before Coleman gets his ass in sling for malpractice. His clients deserve a legitimate defense. How he can continue to put Baker and his cast of crazies forward as experts is beyond reason. Seth Kalichmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01715826946361587097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-56638681092593891562013-06-11T00:51:46.911-04:002013-06-11T00:51:46.911-04:00I think that Hendricks would have a hard time plea...I think that Hendricks would have a hard time pleading ignorance of Baker's and Coleman's scam here. It looks to me like he was fully aware of what they were up to when he misused the University of Massachusetts' equipment and name to produce bogus "HIV negative" test results on demand.<br /><br />On his website Baker has published an affidavit from Miranda Kelewood, who is a paralegal in another case involving Baker, Coleman and Hendricks. She writes:<br /><br /><i>"Dr. Hendricks stated he became aware of the aforementioned ease through contact with Mr. Clark Baker. Dr. Hendricks was initially willing to assist because he had a history of working with Mr. Baker and never had any issues with the cases. Dr. Hendricks had informed OMSJ that he was available to testify telephonically for a motions hearing and was willing to travel to North Carolina and testify at the trial, if necessary."</i><br /><br />Hendricks is up to his eyeballs in it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-29377538167789825102013-06-10T23:04:18.604-04:002013-06-10T23:04:18.604-04:00Clark has published Greg Hendricks' affidavit ...Clark has published Greg Hendricks' affidavit and the letter he wrote to David Rasnick, along with the three EM images they intended to use in court.<br /><br />www.omsj.org/cases/2011/nushawn/Hendricks%20REDACTED.pdf<br /><br />If you want to see what human plasma looks like when it's diluted tenfold with ammonium acetate solution and examined under 46,000x magnification, check it out. The methodology is, of course, complete hogwash for telling whether someone is infected with HIV or not, and any court that takes this seriously as "evidence" will make itself a laughing stock.<br /><br />It appears that Hendricks has withdrawn from giving evidence in the case after someone made enquiries about whether his laboratory has the legally required accreditation to perform diagnostic testing on human tissue samples. According to Clark, asking this basic question triggered an "investigation" by the university and as a result "Hendricks' reputation as a faculty member was completely soiled".<br /><br />I actually feel sorry for Nushawn Williams here, being saddled with such an incompetent and ludicrously idiotic defence strategy. Yet again the clowns of Rethinking AIDS have taken a serious and complex issue and reduced it to farce.<br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /><br />Snouthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00315836146914661895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-23617477852693156982013-06-10T14:09:38.108-04:002013-06-10T14:09:38.108-04:00Of course they don't. That is the whole point....Of course they don't. That is the whole point. THen they can say they looked and the virus does exist. Thus continuing their insane delusions.los angeles tax attorneyhttp://klasing-associates.com/los-angeles-tax-attorneynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-71924102679803399712013-06-10T07:21:35.984-04:002013-06-10T07:21:35.984-04:00My my question is..Were you aware that your result...My my question is..Were you aware that your results would be used by David Rasnick and Clark Baker as evidence that HIV diagnostics are invalid and useless? That they would say HIV is harmless? That your science would be used by pseudo scientists like Rasnick, Richards, and Banks in their legal scheme with attny Coleman to bring cranks into the courtroom?<br />And I wonder if you will do it again?Seth Kalichmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01715826946361587097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-18040636139305786882013-06-08T17:58:24.040-04:002013-06-08T17:58:24.040-04:009. On the afternoon of 9th of April 2013, I receiv...9. On the afternoon of 9th of April 2013, I received one sample of human blood plasma from BioReference Laboratories, Inc. (Federal Express Tracking number 8018 1315 8373) at the U. Mass Core Electron Microscopy Facility. The package <br />appeared to be intact and the seals unbroken. The sample was marked NW060313, and contained three fresh sample tubes of human plasma, stored and shipped on wet ice. I placed the sample in the laboratory refrigerator until Thursday morning (April 11th). <br /> <br />10. On the morning of April 11 (Thursday), I transferred a 1 ml aliquot of the sample to a microfuge tube and centrifuged to pellet the cell debris and clean the plasma. Following the centrifugation, I took a 10µl aliquot of the supernatant and applied it onto a freshly prepared carbon stabilized formvar support grid and negative stained the sample with 1% unaryl acetate, air dried and examined it on a Philips CM 10 at 80Kv accelerating voltage and imaged the sample using a Gatan fast scan digital camera (accompanying micrographs). Because the original plasma sample was concentrated, I also ran samples of the plasma after dilution (1:10) in 100 mM ammonium acetate. <br /><br />11. I observed that the undiluted plasma sample was full of what appears to be protein aggregates and strands, and a few lipid vesicles; so much so that individual particles cannot be resolved easily (ATTACHMENT 2, image NW 060313 Conc 46 KX b). After diluting the original blood plasma 1:10 with 100 mM Ammonium Acetate, the protein aggregates and small lipid vesicles were easily resolved when observed at 46,000X (see micrograph NW 060313 46 KX a, arrows indicate the lipid vesicles). There were also numerous particles of what appears to be AAV (Adeno Associate Virus), based on their size and morphology (see micrograph NW 060313 46 KX b, arrow indicates AAV-like particle). I also found numerous large membrane fragments in this plasma sample (see micrograph NW 060313 46 KX c, arrows). The only virus-like particles observed in this blood plasma sample are probably AAV, a small (24 nm) non-enveloped virus which infects humans and is not known to cause disease. <br /><br />12. I found no evidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or any other virus-like particles in this sample. All Images were recorded at 46,000X.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> <br />Greg Hendricks Affadavitnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-5341508312936790242013-06-05T22:37:09.012-04:002013-06-05T22:37:09.012-04:00We both know that it takes something like half a b...We both know that it takes something like half a billion possible micrographs to cover a ml of blood, and that even someone with a very high viral load only has ~10,000 or so viruses to find in that area, 100,000 if we are very generous. It would take extraordinary luck to pick one out on the first shot. But then they can say the virus doesn't exist. <br /><br />Unfortunately for CD4 cells, there is a large difference between a dilute suspension and a non-existent one.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04293101760872722171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-52169866614536713572013-06-05T22:30:07.781-04:002013-06-05T22:30:07.781-04:00Of course they don't. That is the whole point....Of course they don't. That is the whole point. THen they can say they looked and the virus does exist. Thus continuing their insane delusions.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04293101760872722171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-37887830163358696682013-06-03T13:09:15.409-04:002013-06-03T13:09:15.409-04:00The only real use of EM- to try and find evidence ...The only real use of EM- to try and find evidence of Clarkie's Brain!<br /><br />But which is the smallest peanut- the brain of Clark, Duesberg or Farber?<br /><br />Even smaller- their heart! Nonexistent- their courage! Even PCR would not work,<br /><br />Yes, the trio without a heart, brain or courageCan EM find Clarkie's Brain?noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-39528558923600481402013-06-03T09:10:43.133-04:002013-06-03T09:10:43.133-04:00regardless of the uselessness of EM being used on ...regardless of the uselessness of EM being used on "blood tests", do the idiots think that they can actually zoom in on a virus in the blood when someone has an undetectable viral load anyway?<br /><br />That isn't just finding a bus in a parkinglot, its like spotting one in the Andromeda galaxy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-54245263865485909032013-05-28T16:22:57.789-04:002013-05-28T16:22:57.789-04:00These people are proving once again what extreme h...These people are proving once again what extreme hypocrites they are.<br /><br />At one time they claimed that EMs of HIV were no good and did not prove that an EM was actually HIV. They claimed it was "cellular debris". <br /><br />NOW they are claiming that EMs are the best thing ever for searching blood for HIV. Over at Baker's OMSJ site, he has put up a new post about how great EMs are and he even has a hyperlink on Robert Gallo that links to a PBS site and not back to Baker's own OMSJ site with a myriad of horrible lies about what a fraud Gallo is!<br /><br />This is just like how they claim that PCR is a God send for every thing EXCEPT HIV! Just wait until they need PCR to uphold one of their delusions and then it will be the next, greatest thing! <br /><br />It's amazing that Baker et al can not see how the rest of see what hypocrites they all are. SO FUNNY!!Truthy McTruthensteinhttp://www.hivinnocenceprojecttruth.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-9018065714883771742013-05-28T10:59:44.621-04:002013-05-28T10:59:44.621-04:00Clark Baker and his OMSJ were just found GUILTY of...Clark Baker and his OMSJ were just found GUILTY of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in a case where he was attempting to silence the First Amendment Rights of his critics:<br /><br />http://www.thedomains.com/2013/05/10/office-of-medical-scientific-justice-guilty-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/<br /><br />Baker was found guilty of attempted theft of two sites:<br />HIV Innocence Group Truth &<br />HIV Innocence Project Truth<br /><br />These two sites which contain identical content, are highly critical of claims by Baker that he has been successful in 52 HIV Criminalization Cases, much like this Nushawn Williams case. These two sites provide proof to the General Public of Baker's fraud by supplying Attorney communications, Journalist Reports and specific court documents. It's no wonder Baker has gone to such lengths to silence the truth.<br /><br />Both sites will be back up for Public Viewing shortly now that Baker has not only lost his case, but was found Guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.Truthy McTruthensteinhttp://www.truthwinsout.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-62927014028576496762013-05-27T03:42:13.058-04:002013-05-27T03:42:13.058-04:00Seriously? Even in an ebola patient with incredibl...Seriously? Even in an ebola patient with incredible viral load, you aren't likely to image a virus by chance. Certainly the micrograph isn't created that way.notElonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04857651031212875523noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-31927783611124708352013-05-26T19:08:43.989-04:002013-05-26T19:08:43.989-04:00There's no suggestion the blood was cultured f...There's no suggestion the blood was cultured first. If it had, then the "test" would have been described as a culture test, not merely "a thorough examination with an electron microscope".<br /><br />The denialist meme they are trying to bring to life here is that the only true isolation is from "fresh uncultured plasma":<br /><br /><i>"Isolation, Papadopulos explains, is the only sure proof that a virus is present--the only direct, unambiguous evidence of a virus. And isolation from <b>uncultured</b> patient plasma is the only sure proof that a person harbors an active infection-- the only sort of infection that can cause disease. She points out that the accuracy for even a properly constructed viral test (one made from true viral isolates) can be established only by answering the following question: In what fraction of people who test positive can the virus be isolated from their fresh (uncultured) plasma?</i><br /><br />http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/ppisolation.htm<br /><br />Snouthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00315836146914661895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-17737449476939331652013-05-26T17:52:44.845-04:002013-05-26T17:52:44.845-04:00You could detect it, but you'd have to concent...You could detect it, but you'd have to concentrate it by exposing the blood to cultures of T-cells and allowing repeated replication and then preparation to extract the virus. <br /><br />A Western Blot would be easiernotElonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04857651031212875523noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-633581663557175057.post-11497576994075372532013-05-25T22:12:28.548-04:002013-05-25T22:12:28.548-04:00It would be fascinating to know whether Greg Hendr...It would be fascinating to know whether Greg Hendricks really believes you can tell whether someone has HIV or not by doing a "thorough examination" of their blood with an electron microscope. <br /><br />I suspect his work has been spun and misrepresented by the denialists, but if that's not the case he wouldn't be the first scientist to develop blitheringly idiotic beliefs about fields outside their area of expertise.<br /><br />Either way, the University of Massachusetts Medical School has a serious embarrassment on their hands, given the high profile of this case internationally. I wonder if they will make a public clarification, or if they will simply sweep the problem under the rug and hope it goes away?<br /><br />Former traffic cop Clark Baker has described the scientific basis of their claims in this case. Apparently he did a Google search and has concluded from this that you can spot retroviruses in whole blood like a school bus viewed from a police helicopter:<br /><br /><i>"A Google search reveals that electron microscopy (EM) was first used in 1975 to observe retroviruses. In 1983, Robert Gallo used EM to identify HIV, a retrovirus.<br /><br />EM detects objects as small as .5 nanometers, which means that, when present, the 120 nanometer HIV is as obvious as a yellow school bus on an asphalt parking lot."</i><br />Snouthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00315836146914661895noreply@blogger.com